Monday 30 November 2015

UMDONI COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROJECT

We believe that addiction is  a symptom of a greater disease, rooted in disconnection,  which affects not only individuals but our communities and society as a whole.
We believe that addicts of all types are those who are most strongly affected by this disease.  Addicts  in recovery are thus an important resource of recovery capital that can be mobilized to serve as recovery carriers within the community.

 We believe that this resource can be mobilised to bring recovery to addicts who cannot afford the enormous costs involved in the treatment system.

We believe that Recovery from addiction is a lifelong process of learning and that present treatment models that see recovery as brief intervention are ineffective.

Our vision is to nurture and support a vibrant recovery community in which individual, family  and community healing and re-connection can take place.
 Our Mission
1.       To mobilise individual, family and community resources to promote a culture of recovery. Particularly to include recovering addicts in the process of recovery.
2.       To make such resources available  so individuals, families and communities are able to get the help they need to recover.
3        To develop and nurture a strong grassroots networks of recovery community organizations offering opportunities for people to make their voices heard, and providing a forum for community service and opportunities for community development and upliftment.

4.       To strengthen and support natural family and community ties as the first line of social support with the aim of creating a healing environment that enhances personal, family and community health.
5.       To bring the message of  recovery to the majority of people who cannot afford the expense of  rehabilitation and treatment programs.
6.       To broaden public understanding of the reality of the disease of addiction and the process of recovery and reduce the stigma associated with addiction
7.       To move beyond an  individual concept of recovery to a communal one, encompassing families and communities.
8.       To advocate for planning and policies at all levels of society to enhance recovery, and for more addiction research, prevention, and treatment.


Practical goals
  1. To provide peer-based recovery support services which cover a wide range of activities not generally offered by current treatment providers. Such services may include (but are not limited to)  peer support (e.g., recovery coaching), resource access ( housing, transportation, computers, library) vocational training, community service, employment services, telephone support, access to support groups, system navigation, recovery resource dissemination, life skills training and clean living social activities.
  2. To provide information on and facilitate access to existing treatment and recovery resources.
  3. To provide a forum for community service. To get recovering addicts involved in community upliftment and development  projects. To challenge the stigma of addiction by demonstration that recovering addicts can be positive role models and assets to their communities. 
  4.  To celebrate recovery from addiction through public events.
  5.  To act as a catalyst for bringing together  community institutions, government, business, and industry, civic and neighbourhood organization, treatment centres, health and social service agencies, educational institutions, the criminal justice system; religious institutions; sports and leisure institutions; the arts community; and media institutions to find common ground in addressing this issue.
  6.  Seek to expand philanthropic and public support for addiction treatment, recovery support services, and recovery advocacy .
  7. To  support  research that illuminates the processes of long-term recovery and establishes an evidence base for effective strategies, in particular  peer and community – based support systems.
  8.  To provide public education and foster awareness. To put  a face and a voice on recovery to educate the public, policy makers, service providers, and the media about the reality of recovery
  9.  Policy advocacy. Challenging the criminalisation of addiction,  the war on drugs and advocating for more effective public policies aimed at supporting peer-and community-based  recovery and treatment. Investigating and encouraging the introduction of drug courts and diversion programs for drug related offences.

In the longer term we also aim to establish:

  •  a clean living communal home which will provide a home environment for addicts  in recovery under  the supervision and care of addicts with longer clean time.
  • a community centre which will provide a resource centre for the local community and  a place for community-wide sober social activities, workshops, meetings, and resource connections .




Motivation for a peer-based , community oriented recovery paradigm.

The present model of rehabilitation is based on the myth that that addicts can and should be cured by a single episode of treatment in a rehabilitation centre. This simply does not happen. Most addicts will relapse and need several visits to rehabs before they finally get clean. Addiction is a chronic ailment.  As with any other chronic ailments, recovery from addiction is a life-long process and requires ongoing vigilance and commitment to following a treatment regime. Chronic ailments are not cured, but can go into remission and the sufferer may gain a temporary reprieve from  its effects.
William White, a leading expert of the recovery movement in the US[1] claims that the  prevailing acute care paradigm is flawed and sets people up for failure “We are currently placing people with severe, complex, and prolonged addiction careers within treatment designs whose brevity and low intensity produces little likelihood of a positive recovery outcome. When resumption of addiction then occurs, as it does so often, the individual is blamed and punished (via divorce, loss of child custody, revocation of probation, job dismissal, expulsion from school, etc.) on the grounds that “they had their chance and blew [i]it.”
There is, however,  growing evidence that the longer people spend in treatment, the longer they participate in the NA and AA fellowships, the greater chance they have of recovery.
In this country the majority of addicts will never be able to afford rehab and the state does not have the resources to bring even a fraction into state subsidised rehabilitation. Even for the better off citizens who can afford rehab.... the multiple stays that are often required before true recovery starts can be a huge and debilitating drain. Many a family has gone bankrupt trying to get a loved one clean. A new model of sustained recovery management is needed  with increased interest in post treatment support mechanisms and for developing and mobilising recovery support resources within communities.
Often when an addict comes into recovery (or wishes to do so)  they have no resources left. Material possessions  have all  been sold, and  friends and family alienated.  In such a situation an addict may become desperate enough to be willing to go to any lengths to make a change in their life. Or they may simply become hopeless and give up.  If no resources are available the second scenario is most likely. Some resources are necessary for an addict to recover , even it is just a sense of hope or someone who cares enough to help. Initially all resources  need to come from an outside source.

Access to treatment will allow an addict to build up psychological, mental and spiritual resources   -- but where does that leave someone coming out of treatment with no material or community resources available to him? And how does an addict with no financial resources get into treatment in the first place?....Many treatment centres do offer reduced rates or even free treatment for a small number of patients. The state has also begun to open state funded treatment centres. While these initiatives are admirable they are  but a drop in the ocean. According to Davidson and White et al [2]  in the US   only 10% of people in need of treatment for substance abuse receive such treatment annually and only 25% will receive such treatment at any stage during their lives. Given the lower rates of access to health care in South Africa the figures here are most likely significantly lower.

What needs to be explored locally is not only the need for post-treatment recovery support but innovative ways of bringing treatment and recovery to communities and people that cannot afford to pay for extended stays in institutions...

Also important in the South African context is the idea of Community Recovery - not only in the sense of recovery in the community but of the recovery of communities. Communities that have been subject to historical traumas are more susceptible to addiction and drug and alcohol related problems. These communities are in need of healing. They suffer from a range of social ills of which drugs and alcohol are but a part. They do however play an significant  role in exacerbating those problems depriving the communities of  resources and draining hope. On a positive note recovery is contagious. Recovery is spread through exposure to recovery carriers (“wounded healers”)—people in recovery make it infectious  through carrying the message of their personal story of hope and redemption and their love and service to those still suffering. By building up recovery capital in these areas we may be able to make a beginning at untangling the web of interrelated social ills.  Individuals coming into recovery begin to be positive role models for the youth replacing the gangsters and drug dealers as people to be admired and emulated  -- representing the only path to wealth and upward mobility. Parents  begin to spend more time with their family and being a positive influence in their children’s lives. Children spend more time at school and engaged in creative, sporting and learning activities.  Less violence, less crime, less unwanted pregnancy---these could be the result of a fairly small number of people coming into recovery and beginning of a significant shift to community healing.

It has been said that an injury to one is an injury to all. We believe that a healing of one is the healing of all




[1] ( William L. White. (2007). The New Recovery Advocacy Movement in America. Addiction,102, 696–703.)
[2]  Larry Davidson PhD , William L. White MA , Dave Sells PhD , Timothy Schmutte PhD , Maria O'Connell PhD , Chyrell Bellamy PhD & Michael Rowe PhD. (2010) Enabling or Engaging? The Role of Recovery Support Services in Addiction Recovery. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 28:4, 391-416,




Saturday 19 September 2015

PH.D CONCEPT PAPER

  
Proposed Title:
‘Routes to recovery from drug addiction: An oral history account of addicts in recovery on the KZN South Coast’  

Through my  experience with long-term drug addiction and recovery, and extensive reading on the subject I have come to believe that the present model  of addiction treatment is limited in three crucial respects.

Addiction is still by and large treated as an acute ailment which can and should be cured after a short stay in a treatment centre.  Increasingly research is showing that that is not viable. While providing short term  therapy might provide a structure for ongoing recovery, in and of itself it is inadequate. Recovery is increasingly been revealed though experience and research as a long term process which requires finding ways  in assisting drug users  to feel connected and purposive. 

Secondly, present treatment models focus on the individual,  overlooking the community and social aspects of the problem. If we are to truly understand addiction as a long term illness, it is critical to understand the role that community plays in contributing to the illness and in remedying it.

Thirdly, treatment is expensive and the vast majority of addicts will never be able to afford the costs involved. Though efforts are being made to make treatment affordable and available resources simply do not exist  to meet the need. In the meantime, addiction numbers are rising and the longer this is left untreated, the more endemic this social and public health problem is likely to become.
These limitations are the research problem to be addressed in the dissertation. The objective is to explore alternative pathways to recovery which address these. It is for this reason that it is important to gain a deep understanding of how those who are in long term recovery came to the point they are at. This dissertation therefore will focus on the pathways to recovery of a group of addicts, some of whom have been clean for a sustained period of time, some still struggling, but with a desire to find recovery.

The focus of the study will be a group of recovering addicts in Umzinto on the Natal South Coast, mainly , but not exclusively from Riverside Park, a poor community particularly hard hit by drug addiction, especially whoonga. This group has been chosen purposively as it comprises of addicts who are actively seeking, and involved in recovery through participation in Narcotics Anonymous.   This group has grown from two regular attendees at NA a year ago to a core of eight members now clean between 3 weeks and 1 year, plus a growing group of between 6-10 addicts still in active who regularly attend meetings expressing the desire to get and stay clean. This will be a longitudinal study using qualitative research techniques . I plan is to collect life stories (Oral Histories) from these addicts and follow their progress over the next few years.. not only for the three years of my doctoral studies but beyond. Further I plan to hold focus groups to discuss various aspects of addiction and recovery.  I will also interview family members and other members of the community as to the effect addiction has had in the community and, as the study progresses the effect a group of recovering addicts has on the community as they begin to reintegrate. I would also be drawing on aspects of applied research through describing and evaluating  of  community initiatives as they develop. There are a number of initiatives planned in the area (greater Umdoni) which these addicts would be part of, and which the study would cover. These would be aimed at addressing the above limitations and modelled on the initiatives of the American recovery movement.
The following objectives guide the study:
  • ·         To explore and document the experiences, through addiction and recovery, of a group of recovering addicts, involved in active recovery programs as a means of gaining greater understanding of the pathways in and out of addiction. 
  • ·         To explore and document the experiences of members of families and communities of these addicts as a means to gain greater  understanding of the link between individual addiction and  family and community trauma and vulnerability, as well as between individual and community recovery.
  • ·         To  document   and assess the progress of a Community Recovery  program which is being developed in this community  as it unfolds  with the intention of investigating, and ultimately contributing toward designing a new and effective model for treating drug addiction that ‘fits’ with the localised South African context, taking account of the afore-mentioned limitations.
  • ·         To critically engage with the various debates about addiction recovery in the existing literature, particularly that emerging from the Recovery  movement,  and to contribute to theoretical and evidential debates

The Recovery movement which has come to the fore in America has addressed these issues. This movement  locates both addiction and recovery firmly within the community. The focus of this movement is on  involving recovering addicts and those affected by addiction (families and communities) in the healing process and the reintegration of addicts back into their communities. It is strongly rooted in the ideas, drawn from the 12 step program of the Narcotics and Alcoholics Anonymous movements,  of one addict helping another and of recovery being dependent on service to others. A strong network of Community Recovery organisations has emerged. These are embedded in communities through establishing Recovery Community Centres. The movement is also engaged in advocacy, education and research and a strong body of academic writing is emerging.

William White and other writers in the recovery tradition have claimed that communities that have been victims of  what they call “historical trauma” become particularly vulnerable to a wide spectrum of personal and social problems. Such trauma erodes indigenous sources of cultural and personal resilience leaving communities, community institutions, neighbourhoods, families, and individuals  particularly vulnerable to drug and alcohol related  problems.  I believe this to be particularly relevant  the South African context. Through my own experience and through contact with other addicts I have realised that the one thing we have in common is a sense of alienation, of not being fully part of one’s family, one’ s community,  and disconnected from one’s peers. This is backed up in the literature. It seems to me that this experience is paralleled  at a community level and the communities most at risk of drug and alcohol related problems  are those most alienated from  economic and cultural processes.  White also draws from Native American culture with its concepts of the “wounded healer” and the “healing forest” (the “healthy” community.)


My contention is that our society suffers from a dis-ease, rooted in alienation,  of which the individual addict is but  the symptom and carries the burden of suffering. Perhaps through the healing and reintegration of  individuals a greater healing can begin and the lessons of addiction and recovery at an individual level could  hold some solutions for  our broken communities and for society at large.

Thursday 3 September 2015

Concept note for Doctoral studies



Proposed title:
‘Routes to recovery from drug addiction: An oral history account of addicts in recovery on the KZN South Coast’
Personal Background:
As a result of my own personal history I have chosen to do a dissertation that focuses on drug use and recovery instead. I have become interested in this field of addiction recovery  through my own experience of addiction and realised that with my experience I can make a contribution.  I have  suffered a long term battle with drug addiction and came into treatment early last year at  a rehabilitation centre in Scottburgh on the South Coast. On leaving treatment 18 months ago I decided to stay in Umdoni where there is a very strong fellowship of recovering addicts and have immersed myself into the program and activities of Narcotics Anonymous.  I have also used this time to do research, on my own volition, on addiction and recovery with a particular interest in the Recovery Movement in the USA and other treatment and recovery models around the world.
I am also a member of the Harm Reduction Advocacy Group which is co-ordinated by the UFC@DUT. I believe that my meeting up with Prof. Monique Marks has been very fortuitous. I am keen to combine my social science training with my deep interest in health sciences. The project focus of the UFC@DUT on street level drug addiction resonates with my personal and academic interests.
 While I have no formal training in the Health Sciences, I do believe that this is the correct      Faculty for me to conduct my doctoral research on pathways to recovery for drug addiction, which I view as a chronic illness. Not only do I hope that my doctoral work will assist in understandings pathways to recovery further, but I am also keen to use this doctoral programme to assist in establishing a community based organisation that centres on community recovery and makes use of alternative models of therapy and treatment. I have already began my research journey by reading extensively on the recovery movement, but also through conducting in-depth oral histories of a wide range of individuals who are currently in recovery.
It is my view that studying in the field of Health Science will enable me to be able to work more effectively, and with greater credibility, in the broad health sector. But most importantly, I view this doctoral degree as an opportunity to learn more about drug addiction recovery, and to contribute to this body of knowledge in significant ways, and within the context of KwaZulu-Natal.
Background to the dissertation:
As a recovering drug addict, and someone who has read extensively about both addiction and recovery, I have come to believe that existing models of addiction treatment are very limited. Addiction is by and large treated as an acute illness that can and should be cured after a short stay (one to three months)  in a treatment centre. Increasingly research is showing that that is not viable or effective, and that simply weaning off or detoxifying users is inadequate in the medium to long term. It is for this reason that most rehabilitation programmes fail to ‘cure’ addicts of their illness in the longer term, and instead what is most evident is repeat relapse and wasted expenditure.
Short term medical and even psychological interventions are without doubt ineffective. What is required is a real understanding not simply of the biological factors that contribute to addiction, but the more deep level motivation for getting into drug use in the first place. Much of this has to do with feelings of social disconnect and dissociation, as well as ways of coping with traumatic and stress. While providing short term  therapy might establish a structure for ongoing recovery, in and of itself it is inadequate. Staying clean is a long term process and extended recovery  requires finding ways  in assisting drug users  to feel connected and purposive. What is evident from the latest research on recovery is that that long term addicts often have little or no life-skills or resources to stay clean. What is required, then, is sustained help with reintegrating into society, and developing alternative ways to deal with the personal and social problems that led them into addiction in the first place.
Another limitation with existing addiction treatment models is that they are by and large focused on the individual. The community context from which the individual comes and the social dynamics that feed addiction habits are largely overlooked. What is required then  is more community based approach that addresses  social dynamics in much the same way as is now happening with other chronic illnesses such as diabetes and obesity. If we are to truly understand addiction as a long term illness, it is critical to understand the role that community plays in contributing to the illness and in remedying it. William White and others have claimed that communities where addiction levels are high have been victims of what they call “historical trauma”. Such trauma erodes indigenous sources of cultural and personal resilience leaving communities, community institutions, neighbourhoods, families, and individuals particularly vulnerable to drug and alcohol related problems. This, I believe is crucial to the rise in drug addiction in the South African context where whole communities have experienced and continue to experience collective trauma, and where individuals have become disconnected and alienated from family and community. It is therefore important in the South African context to gain a deeper understanding of how individual vulnerability to drug addiction is mirrored with broader community vulnerability and risk.
A third and critical problem with existing rehabilitation treatment is that it is extremely costly. The majority of addicts are unable to afford the cost of the existing treatment centres, even those that are short term in their services. And in resource poor countries like South Africa, the chances of having long term holistic intervention in the public sector is unlikely in the short to medium term. In the meantime, addiction numbers are rising and the longer this is left untreated, the more endemic this social and public health problem is likely to become.
It is for this reason that it is important to gain a deep understanding of how those who are in long term recovery came to the point they are at. This dissertation therefore will focus on the pathways to recovery of a group of addicts, some of whom have been clean for a sustained period of time, some still struggling to find recovery , but with a strong desire to do so. There are various possible paths to recovery and the point of this dissertation is to uncover what they are and to see which ones are thought to be most effective.
The thinking behind this dissertation is largely based on literature on the recovery movement. The recovery movement locates both addiction and recovery firmly within the community. The focus of this movement is on involving recovering addicts, and those affected by addiction (families and communities) in the healing process, and the reintegration of addicts back into their communities. It is strongly rooted in the ideas, drawn from the 12 step program of the Narcotics and Alcoholics Anonymous movements, of one addict helping another and of recovery being dependent on service to others. While the movement primarily started in America  where there is a strong network of Community Recovery organisations has emerged, and is spreading around the world. In South Africa though this movement is in its infancy.
 These organisations are embedded in communities through establishing Recovery Community Centres, which host a range of activities from out-patient therapy, to life-skill and job training, to providing a venue for creative and recreational activities. They also operate as a resource centre for families and social and health care workers to learn about addiction. The movement is also engaged in advocacy, education and research and a strong body of academic writing is emerging. In places like the US and Northern Ireland, the recovery movement is now gaining increasing support from both those in the health care professions and from police who are confronted with the back end of addiction consistently.
Johan Hari has also drawn attention to the importance  social context plays in driving addiction through elaborating on the famous  “Rat Park” experiment. For Hari the prime drive of addiction is disconnection and the focus of recovery should be reconnection.
Anne Wilson Schaeff argues that our society is driven by addictive behaviour. The obsession with extracting fossils fuels with no regard to the environmental damage  and our fixation with material wealth and possessions as a measure of success and happiness  certainly mirror the behaviour of an addict..
My contention is that our society suffers from a dis-ease of which the individual addict is but the symptom and carries the burden of suffering. Perhaps through the healing and reintegration of individuals a greater healing can begin and the lessons of addiction and recovery at an individual level could hold some solutions for our broken communities and for society at large.
Objectives of the study are:
·         To  discover, through Oral histories  the most effective routes out of drug addiction
·         To document the stories of users who are part of a recovery community on the KZN South Coast
·         To follow and assess the progress of a Community Recovery program which is being introduced in this community as it unfolds
·         To document the processes and the structure of the Umdoni Recovery Programme with the intention of investigating new model for drug addiction treatment
·         To understand the link between individual addiction and community trauma and vulnerability.
·         To critically engage with the various debates about addiction recovery in the existing literature and to contribute to theoretical and evidential debates
·         To ultimately contribute toward designing an effective model for treating drug addiction that ‘fits’ with the localised South African context.
Key questions to be answered:
Given the above, the following questions are viewed as central to this dissertation:
·         What are the most effective and sustainable pathways out of long term drug addiction?
·         What are the pathways into drug addiction?
·         In what way do family and community factors contribute to individual addiction?
·         What impact does addiction have on communities?
·         In what ways can families and communities be involved in individual recovery?
·         In what ways can individuals be involved in community recovery?
·         What alternatives to the mainstream rehabilitation programmes should be developed in a South African context?
Research methodology
This study will focus on a group of recovering addicts that are living in the broad Umzinto district on the Natal South Coast. The majority, but not all of these addicts are from Riverside Park, a poor community particularly hard hit by drug addiction, especially whoonga. This group has been chosen purposively as it comprises of addicts who are actively seeking, and involved in recovery through participation in a Narcotics Anonymous group of which I am a part.   This group has grown from two regular attendees at NA a year ago to a core of eight members now clean between 3 weeks and 1 year, plus a growing group of between 6-10 addicts still in active who regularly attend meetings expressing the desire to get and stay clean.
This study will mainly comprise of oral histories which will allow those in recovery to tell their stories in a manner that is not constrained nor overly directed. The oral histories will be taken over two different periods of time allowing for some evaluation of the effectiveness of the pathways that the recovering addicts that are part of the study have opted for. The two points of conducting oral histories will be 12-18 months apart.
I  plan to hold focus groups with recovering addicts in Umzinto to deliberate various aspects of addiction and recovery. I will also interview family members and other members of the community as to the effect addiction has had in the community and, as the study progresses the effect a group of recovering addicts has on the community as they begin to reintegrate.
Further a number of  initiatives are being planned in this community. An NGO is being put together to raise funding to start a community centre. This will obviously be  a long term process. In the meantime creative and innovative ways of  implementing some of the ideas of community recovery will be pursued.  Throughout this research process, I will be drawing on aspects of applied research through the describing and evaluating of these initiatives as they develop.





Monday 20 July 2015

Alternatives to Methadone / Suboxone


In the book “How to Quit without Feeling Sh*t”(Published by Piatkus Books : London: 2008) Drs. Patrick Holford, David Miller and James Braly explore the use of nutrient supplements, especially Amino Acids but also vitamins, minerals and essential fats… in the treatment of addiction. Their  rationale is that drugs disrupt the production of essential brain chemicals including serotonin and dopamines. They literally mimic and effectively replace these chemical in the brain, with the result that the body stops producing them. This accounts for the withdrawals felt by addicts when they quit using . They are suffering from a lack of the natural chemicals their body would normally produce.  Treatments such as methadone and suboxone, benzodiazepines etc only compound this problem as they only replace one  addictive substance with another , further interfering with the natural  chemistry of the brain..   Amino acid supplements on the other hand naturally help the body to replace these chemicals thus relieving withdrawal effects without the major side effects of pharmaceuticals. 
 The doctors have compiled a treatment plan for each addictive substance drawing from an array of amino acids, vitamins and minerals . There are also exercise schedules and eating plans.   I myself have effectively used Tryptophan, Taurine and Glutamine, some of the supplements recommended by Drs Holford et al for the overcoming of heroin addiction…. I could not afford to follow the full regime as the supplements are rather pricey. I found them to be remarkably effective at reducing the unpleasant effects of Heroin withdrawal, particularly the tryptophan (a precursor of serotonin) . Taken on its own it would ease the cramps ,cold turkey  ( hold and cold flushes—turkey skin ) and kicking ( body spasms) effects to the point where they were tolerable. In conjunction with Glutamine and Taurine it would allow me to sleep for up to four hours at a time  even on the first three nights of withdrawal when sleep is unheard of.  Granted I was taking it in dosages as high as three times (only with the Tryptophan)   the recommended dosage ( Holford et al do allow for this and claim it is relatively harmless as long as not continued for more than a few days.)  Also although they helped me get clean they didn’t  help me stay clean…. I continued to relapse even after using this method to get clean…. For that I had to find my way into the rooms of Narcotics Anonymous.  But they did start the process.
I have scoured the net looking for information on this topic and there is nothing on medical or academic  sites, no research being done. Where it is being mentioned is on Q+A and chat sites where addicts are sharing experiences. It seems that because the substances are supplements and thus not open to patenting and resulting big bucks, the pharmaceutical and medical industries are ignoring , if not actively discouraging any information on this topic.
Furthermore Tryptophan is not available as a supplement in the US… the only country in the world where this is the case… It was banned in the 90’s after a contaminated shipment cased people to get ill.. Coincidently (or not) the ban was announced days before the announcement of the introduction of SSRIs (prozac etc) onto the market. It has subsequently been reintroduced as a highly priced patented medication.

There is evidence that these substances work… Granted there may be some problems with them… apparently people react very differently to these substances and what may work for one person may not work for another.  But this is just as true of pharmaceuticals.  There may be side effects and dangers with taking higher dosages.  But research needs to be done… Questions need to be asked.

I would appeal to people who have personal experience and knowledge of the substances to start disseminating his information…with addicts with medical professional, researchers  .. We need to start appealing to doctors and medical researchers to look into the use of these substances.  I am not a medical person but plan to continue doing research in this area and  ask people interested in or with information in this subject to please contact me here.

Sunday 19 July 2015

RECOVERY IS CONTAGIOUS


Addiction is a chronic ailment.  As with any other chronic ailments, recovery from addiction is a life-long process and requires ongoing vigilance and commitment to following a treatment regime. Chronic ailments are not cured, but can go into remission and the sufferer may gain a temporary reprieve from  its effects. Yet the myth persists that addicts can and should be cured by a single episode of treatment in a rehabilitation centre. This simply does not happen. The vast  majority of addicts who have spent 28 days in a treatment centre come out and relapse within the first week. Most addicts will relapse and need several visits to rehabs before they finally get clean.
White ( William L. White. (2007). The New Recovery Advocacy Movement in America. Addiction,102, 696–703.) claims that the  prevailing acute care paradigm is flawed and sets people up for failure “We are currently placing people with severe, complex, and prolonged addiction careers within treatment designs whose brevity and low intensity produces little likelihood of a positive recovery outcome. When resumption of addiction then occurs, as it does so often, the individual is blamed and punished (via divorce, loss of child custody, revocation of probation, job dismissal, expulsion from school, etc.) on the grounds that “they had their chance and blew it.”  This he claims is “analogous to treating a bacterial infection with half of the needed antibiotics and then blaming the patient when the infection returns in a more intractable form.”

 There is, however,  growing evidence that the longer people spend in treatment, the longer they participate in the NA and AA fellowships, the greater chance they have of recovery.
In this country the majority of addicts will never be able to afford rehab and the state does not have the resources to bring even a fraction into state subsidised rehabilitation. Even for the better off citizens who can afford rehab.... the multiple stays that are often required before true recovery starts can be a huge and debilitating drain. Many a family has gone bankrupt trying to get a loved one clean. A new model of sustained recovery management is needed  with increased interest in post treatment support mechanisms and for developing and mobilising recovery support resources within communities


In the late 1990s, new grassroots recovery community organizations (RCOs) began springing up across America. The last two decades has seen the proliferation of new recovery institutions across the country including recovery  homes, centres, schools, ministries and even industries. According to White et al William (L. White , John F. Kelly & Jeffrey D. Roth (2012). New Addiction-Recovery Support Institutions: Mobilizing Support Beyond Professional Addiction Treatment and Recovery Mutual Aid. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 7:2-4, 297-317.) these new recovery support institutions share several distinctive features. First, they fit neither the designation of addiction treatment nor of recovery mutual-aid fellowship. Second, they provide recovery support needs not directly addressed through either of the above. Third, their target of support extends beyond the individual. Where addiction treatment and mutual aid both provide personal guidance during the recovery process, these new recovery support institutions seek to create a physical and social environment  in which personal, family and community recovery can flourish. Fourth, these new institutions reflect, and are in turn being shaped by, a larger culture of recovery.

A broad cultural and political mobilization of people in recovery is emerging bringing with it a greater awareness of the challenges of addiction and recovery. There is a greater sense of identity and belonging to a recovery community enabling  previously marginalized individual
to undergo processes of consciousness raising, mobilization, and culture making. This culture is providing a diversity of new tools-- words, ideas, metaphors, rituals, support institutions, support roles, and recovery support services-- to ease the process of recovery initiation, recovery maintenance, and enhanced quality of life in long-term recovery. What recovering people historically experienced inside treatment or a recovery fellowship—connection, mutual identification, and community—is now being extended beyond the walls of these institutions and meeting rooms. Addiction and recovery is being explored and exposed  in the arts, film, music as never before. Celebrities are making their status as recovering addicts known and sharing their experience with their fans, among them Eminem, Mary J. Blige, Robert Downey Junior, Eric Clapton, Angelina Jolie and Samuel Jackson. As it becomes exposed in the public domain adiction is losing its taboo status, addicts become less stigmatised and it becomes easier for them and their families to reach out for help.  

One of the central concepts in recovery discourse is that of recovery capital. This term refers to  the collective internal and external resources that can be mobilized to initiate and sustain the resolution of alcohol and drug related problems. In addition to financial, material, and instrumental resources,  recovery capital includes such things as a sense of belonging within a community of peers and supportive relationships with caring others.

Often when an addict comes into recovery (or wishes to do so)  they have no resources left. Material possessions  have all  been sold, and  friends and family alienated.  In such a situation an addict may become desperate enough to be willing to go to any lengths to make a change in their life. Or they may simply become hopeless and give up.  If no resources are available the second scenario is most likely. Some resources are necessary for an addict to recover , even it is just a sense of hope or someone who cares enough to help. Initially all resources  need to come from an outside source. Care however needs to be taken with the resources that are made available to an addict. Simply given an addict money or shelter may  protect them from the natural consequences of their actions and enable them to keep using. It is impossible for  addicts to build up resources as long as they continue to use.

Access to treatment will allow an addict to build up psychological, mental and spiritual resources   -- but where does that leave someone coming out of treatment with no material or community resources available to him? And how does an addict with no financial resources get into treatment in the first place?....Many treatment centres do offer reduced rates or even free treatment for a small number of patients, but this is a drop in the ocean. According to Davidson and White et al   ( Larry Davidson PhD , William L. White MA , Dave Sells PhD , Timothy Schmutte PhD , Maria O'Connell PhD, Chyrell Bellamy PhD & Michael Rowe PhD. (2010) Enabling or Engaging? The Role of Recovery Support Services in Addiction Recovery. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 28:4, 391-416,)  in the US   only 10% of people in need of treatment for substance abuse receive such treatment annually and only 25% will receive such treatment at any stage during their lives. Given the lower rates of access to health care in South Africa the figures here are most likely significantly lower.

The Recovery movement has developed in the American milieu but many of its ideas and tenets may be useful in South Africa, (particularly the community aspects) where the vast majority are unable to afford private treatment and public facilities lack the resources to deal with the problem. What needs to be explored locally is not only the need for post-treatment recovery support but innovative ways of bringing treatment and recovery to communities and people that cannot afford to pay for extended stays in institutions...

Also important in the South African context is the idea of Community Recovery - not only in the sense of recovery in the community but of the recovery of communities. Communities that have been subject to historical traumas are more susceptible to addiction and drug and alcohol related problems. These communities are in need of healing. They suffer from a range of social ills of which drugs and alcohol are but a part. They do however play an significant  role in exacerbating those problems depriving the communities of  resources and draining hope. On a positive note recovery is contagious. Recovery is spread through exposure to recovery carriers (“wounded healers”)—people in recovery make it infectious  through carrying the message of their personal story of hope and redemption and their love and service to those still suffering. By building up recovery capital in these areas we may be able to make a beginning at untangling the web of interrelated social ills.  Individuals coming into recovery begin to be positive role models for the youth replacing the gangsters and drug dealers as people to be admired and emulated  -- representing the only path to wealth and upward mobility. Parents  begin to spend more time with their family and being a positive influence in their children’s lives. Children spend more time at school and engaged in creative, sporting and learning activities.  Less violence, less crime, less unwanted pregnancy---these could be the result of a fairly small number of people coming into recovery and beginning of a significant shift to community healing.




Tuesday 7 July 2015

Community Recovery


Since coming into the NA Fellowship I have realized that the one thing addicts have in common  is a sense of alienation, of not being fully part of one’s family, one’s community,  and disconnected from one’s peers. Often they have suffered a trauma which is at the root of these feelings. It seems to me that this experience may be paralleled  at a community level and the communities most at risk of drug and alcohol related problems  are those most alienated from  economic and cultural processes.  William White et al ( Arthur C. Evans, Roland Lamb & William L. White (2013) The Community as Patient: Recovery Based Community Mobilization in Philadelphia PA (USA), 2005-2012) have claimed that communities that have been victims of  what they call “historical trauma” become particularly vulnerable to a wide spectrum of personal and social problems. They describe historical trauma as a “physical or cultural assault on a people via attempted genocide or sustained colonization.”  Such trauma erodes indigenous sources of cultural and personal resilience leaving communities, community institutions, neighbourhoods, families, and individuals  particularly vulnerable to drug and alcohol related  problems.  Over time, learned helplessness and hopelessness in the face of such problems can become part of the community culture.

The authors continue by  exploring the multiple functions drugs and alcohol play in these communities:    “They serve as a relief from emotional distress, an escape from feelings  of powerlessness, and a trigger  for the discharge of anger.'
Furthermore: “They become symbols of cultural protest and the focus-point of subcultures, some-times creative, but mostly criminal, within which those most disconnected from mainstream community life find mutual support. They spawn underground economies and careers. They serve as instruments of financial exploitation by predatory industries, and they serve as tools of personal and cultural pacification.”

The result of this is a weakening of  family, kinship , neighbourhood, and natural community ties as well as  social institutions (churches, schools, workplaces, civic organizations) which traditionally meet social support needs. This create an environment in which personal and social problems flourish and  personal and collective capacities to respond to rising problems are diminished. Traditional support structures are replaced by alternative social structures, from gangs to mutual aid groups to cell phone and internet-based social networking. Furthermore there is an ever growing need for increasingly industrialized and commercialized health and social services agencies and agents of social control ( police, courts, correctional, and child protection agencies). Reliance on these agencies creates a vicious cycle which further  hastens the dissolution of family, kinship, neighbourhood, and community ties.

From the above we see how personal issues and community issues become interrelated and intertwined when dealing with addiction. At present we have two distinct and separate approaches to the drug problem. On the one hand we have rehabilitation centres, hospitals and institutions , as well as mutual aid organisations like Alcoholics and Narcotics Anonymous, treating the problem at the level of the individual. On the other hand we have government departments, NGO’s and other agencies looking at the problem at the communal level.White et al argue "that the healing process can and should move beyond individuals and families to encompass whole communities" and the creation of  naturally occurring healing environments that "simultaneously elevate personal family and community health." I would argue that we need to start looking at the problem in a more holistic way. Just as community problems feed individual alienation, and vice versa, individual recovery can be the beginning of community recovery, and vice versa.


Anne Wilson Schaeff argues that our society is driven by addictive behaviour. The obsession with extracting fossils fuels with no regard to the environmental damage  and our fixation with material wealth and possessions as a measure of success certainly mirror the behaviour of an addict. Here again the lessons of addiction and recovery at an individual level could perhaps hold some  solution to our societal addictions. (Are we as a society able to learn the lessons of addiction, or will we like an addict in denial have to reach a rock bottom, a point of no return before we are able to make changes?) It seems possible then that exploring and attempting to understand  individual experiences of addiction and recovery  can give us insight to the processes at community and social level.